Date: Sat, 19 Feb 1994 21:38:02 +0800 (AWST) From: Dave Rindos To: michael brian scher Subject: Re: Hardwick Post on Rindos (6/93) > > No problem. I am still rather disturbed at the whole nature of this > suit. It occurred in a public forum, was a mutually provoked dispute, ??? mutually? Jarvis chose to post an article. Hardwick chose to say I am a paedophile, racist, etc. I avoided it like the plague in the hope it would go away. It didn't and instead it spread. What pray tell should I have done?? > and could have been handled in a more direct way. This kind of suit > boils down to a rather petulant resort to the legal system, I fear. And Are you aware that I have lost my job because of the very same kinds of statements as made by Hardwick?? That my name has really been damaged in a very serious manner? I assure you I have NOT done this out of pique, petulance or any other such motive. I simply have no other options left to me. I would MUCH rather be doing my academics, but until my name is cleared I am afraid I have no choice (suggestions for alternatives will be GLADLY accepted!) Do you have a job for a person accused, even if falsly, of paedophilia, sexual harassment, plagiarism, racism, etc etc etc?? Do you see that until my name is LEGALLY cleared my claim of FALSE accusations is meaningless? I am afraid that what I am going through is NOT a flame-fest on the net. It is something MUCH larger. > for that reason primarily, and certainly not because I think Gil's > comments were appropriate in any sense, I take some offense at the use of > this forum to further the process (even if witness affadavits are best > collected in this manner). I am not particularly pleased by it either, but how in the world should I go about changing the nature of rules of evidence in Western Austrlia?? Again, suggstions will be gladly accepted. Dave, apologising if he seems a bit testy, but after three years of this kind of stuff, my sense of humour has begun to suffer....